Research on the Evolution of AI Copyright Attribution Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65455/4zd3jp23关键词:
Artificial Intelligence, AI-Generated Content(AIGC), Copyright Attribution, Evolutionary Mechanism, Originality, Rights Equilibrium摘要
With the continuous iteration of artificial intelligence technology, the AI-generated content has penetrated into various fields of social production and daily life. The copyright ownership mechanism of artificial intelligence generated content evolves with technological progress, legal change and industrial development. This evolution can be divided into three stages : the embryonic stage, the development stage and the mature stage. The core of the conflict is to coordinate the contradiction between technological innovation and the lag of legal regulation. The primary goal is to balance the rights and public interests of multiple stakeholders. This paper systematically combs the evolution of this attribution mechanism by means of literature research, historical analysis, comparative research and case study. This paper makes an in-depth analysis of the core issues such as the absence of legal personality of artificial intelligence, the inconsistency of originality identification standards, and the imbalance of rights distribution among multiple stakeholders. On this basis, it clearly puts forward targeted solutions such as the legal status of artificial intelligence, the standardization of identification standards, and the establishment of a multi-stakeholder rights allocation system. This study improves the theoretical framework of artificial intelligence copyright protection, and provides practical guidance for legislative revision, judicial adjudication and the development of artificial intelligence industry, thus promoting the benign synergy between technological innovation and rights protection.
参考
[1]WU Y, LIU Z, GUO Q. Research on the Countermeasures of Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Works.Citizen and Law (Trial Edition), 2025, (07) : 10-18
[2]HUANG Y. Definition of ' non-works ' attribute of artificial intelligence text map and selection of protection path of neighboring rights.Science of Law - Northwest University of Political and Law, 2026,44(02) : 81-92.
[3]LIU F. The legislative dilemma of copyright ownership of artificial intelligence products. Chinese Brand and Anti-Counterfeiting, 2025, (13) : 66-68.
[4]WANG Q. On the characterization of the content generated by artificial intelligence in copyright law.Science of Law - Northwest University of Political and Law, 2017,35(05): 148-155.
[5]HUANG Z,XU L.Post-Human Perspectives on Film: Exploring Innovative Applications of AIGC.Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2026, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.65455/thwcfx26
[6]ZHU J. Research on copyright ownership of artificial intelligence generated content.Shanxi Science and Technology News, 2023-03-20 (B07).
[7]XU Z. To whom exactly does inspiration belong? The creative rights and aesthetic boundaries behind AI-generated works.Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2025, 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.65455/aair5915
[8]LI C. Research on Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Products. Nanjing University of Science&Technology, 2022.
[9]PU Q, XIANG W. Opportunities and challenges aroused by ChatGPT as generative AI and strategy for response.Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2023(3): 102-114.
[10]ZHANG L, GUO H, FENG X, et al. Artificial Intelligence Generated Content ( AIGC ) Copyright Protection Notes.Digital Rule of Law, 2024, (01): 1-26.
[11]Thaler v. Perlmutter, Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-01564 (BAH) (D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2023).
[12]Beijing Internet Court Civil Judgment, (2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu 11279
[13]YIN J. The subjectivity of generative artificial intelligence.Chinese Social Sciences, 2024, (08): 124-145 + 207.
[14]WU H. Questions about the copyright law of artificial intelligence-generated works.Peking University Law Journal, 2020,32(03): 653-673.
[15]WANG Q. The Qualitative Analysis of Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence in Copyright Law.Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2023, 41(04): 16-33.
[16]ZHANG H,WANG M.Governance Challenges of Synthetic Data in Generative AI Model Training and Approaches for Improvement.Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University( Social Sciences ), 2026, 1-13.
[17]WU H, LIU X. The Legal Response and Institutional Innovation of Intellectual Property Rights in Generative Artificial Intelligence. Technology and Law (Chinese-English Version), 2024, (01): 1-10.
[18]LIU J. Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content: From the Perspective of Comparative Law.Comparative law research, 2024, (04): 176-193.
##submission.downloads##
已出版
##submission.dataAvailability##
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
期次
栏目
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##