To whom exactly does inspiration belong? The creative rights and aesthetic boundaries behind AI-generated works
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65455/aair5915Keywords:
AI + Art Automatic art creation, Creation Right, Aesthetic Edge Deep LearningAbstract
With the rapid development of AI technology, its application in art creation is becoming more and more popular. An automatic generation system of AI art works can generate works of unique style and aesthetic value by means of deep learning algorithms. However, the question of creative ownership behind AI-generated works has always been ambiguous. In this paper, we discuss creative rights and aesthetic boundaries behind AI-generated works. However, there has not been a clear legal definition. In spite of this, AI's automatic generation of artworks has become a major trend. At present there are no laws or regulations that stop the development of AI + art.. On the basis of the above results, we have developed an AI generation system. Using AI technology, it automatically generates artwork that creators want.In addition, the public often believes that the ownership of AI-generated artworks belongs to the AI platform. In fact, the AI system is merely an auxiliary tool, and the creative inspiration still comes from the author. Therefore, this system can generate a contract for the AI system platform to this AI system waive the copyright.Register your copyright on the website of the National Copyright Center to avoid legal disputes and protect the legitimate rights and interests of creators.
References
[1]OPPENLAENDER J, LINDER R, SILVENNOINEN J. Prompting AI Art: An Investigation into the Creative Skill of Prompt Engineering. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2025, 41(16): 10207-10229.
[2]YU C Y. Research on Emotion-Based Inspiration Mechanism in Art Creation by Generative AI. Mathematics, 2025, 13(16): 2597.
[3]YANG J. Research on the Application of AI in Art Design and Digital Media Integration. Arts Studies and Criticism, 2025, 6(3): 546-548.
[4]JOSHUA C. Painting in Gray: The Legal and Ethical Ambiguities of AI-Generated Art. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 2025, 23(3): 384-391.
[5]YUAN H, KIM Y, ZHANG J, et al. Exploring Research Trends and Hotspots in AI and Art Integration: ROST Text Mining Analysis of China and South Korea. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 2025, 25(5): 3961-3972.
[6]WENTAO L, HONG, MYEONG J. Research on the Application of Stable Diffusion-Based Generative AI Tools in Environmental Art Design Education. Journal of Aussie-Sino Studies, 2025, 11(2): 276-279.
[7]PENG X, QIAN Y, BAO Q. Fostering Adolescent Engagement in Generative AI Art Therapy: A Dual SEM-ANN Analysis of Emotional. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, 16: 1628471.
[8]GRASSINI S. Computational Power and Subjective Quality of AI-Generated Outputs: The Case of Aesthetic Judgement and Positive Emotions in AI-Generated Art. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2025, 41(14): 9056-9065.
[9]BENTIVEGNA F. Artificially Voiced Intelligences: Voice and the Myth of AI. AI & SOCIETY, 2025: 1-12.
[10]ZMIGROD L, MOOROSI N, SULTANA F, et al. AI Hype, Crackling Northern Lights and More: Take it All in with These Holiday Reads. Nature, 2025, 643(8072): 628-630.
[11]VILABOA B R, MONTERO P J F, TRILLO R J, et al. AI-Based Prediction of Visual Performance in Rhythmic Gymnasts Using Eye-Tracking Data and Decision Tree Models. Photonics, 2025, 12(7): 711.
[12]ANSANI A, KOEHLER F, GIOMBINI L, et al. AI Performer Bias: Listeners Like Music Less When They Think it was Performed by an AI. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2025, 43(2): 1137-1161.
[13]CHAMBERS K. AI Threat: Equity to Lobby TUC to Protect Artists from 'Greedy' Tech Firms. The Stage, 2025, (21): 6.
[14]HU Y. Creating Interactive AI Learning Environments: Integrating Interdisciplinary Approaches and Taoist Art Principles. Interactive Learning Environments, 2025, 33(6): 3889-3908.
[15]SONG J, LIU S. Dark Personality Traits Are Associated with Academic Misconduct, Frustration, Negative Thinking, and Generative AI Use Habits: The Case of Sichuan Art Universities. BMC Psychology, 2025, 13(1): 633.
