A Closed-Loop Digital Twin Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Post-Disaster Urban Recovery: Integrating Environmental Assessment, Risk Prediction, and Adaptive Resource Management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65455/2e987122

Keywords:

Digital Twin, Post-Disaster Urban Recovery, Urban Resilience, Environmental Risk, Chemical Risk, Sustainable Resource Management, Adaptive Decision Support

Abstract

Natural disasters, climate change, and rapid urbanization have increased the complexity of post-disaster urban recovery, creating challenges in environmental management, risk mitigation, and resource allocation. Conventional recovery approaches often rely on fragmented information and relatively fixed decisions, limiting their ability to respond to changing environmental and recovery conditions. This study proposes a Digital Twin Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Post-Disaster Urban Recovery (DT-SRUR) that integrates multisource urban data, environmental quality assessment, chemical-risk-aware prediction, sustainable resource management, and adaptive decision support. A Chemical Risk-Aware Digital Twin Environmental Risk Prediction Module (CR-DT-ERP) is incorporated to capture evolving chemical-related environmental risks and connect risk information with recovery strategy evaluation and resource allocation. The framework establishes a closed-loop process linking environmental and infrastructure assessment, digital twin state updating, recovery strategy evaluation, resource allocation, recovery actions, and feedback. A controlled synthetic post-earthquake scenario is developed to demonstrate the framework over a 30-day recovery period. Three recovery strategies are compared under common initial conditions and resource constraints: rapid restoration-oriented recovery, sustainability-oriented recovery, and digital twin-based adaptive recovery. The results indicate that the adaptive strategy achieves a more balanced performance across recovery effectiveness, environmental performance, resilience, chemical risk, and resource consumption, rather than maximizing a single objective. The study extends digital twin applications from conventional monitoring toward adaptive and risk-aware post-disaster recovery coordination. The proposed framework provides a structured basis for integrating environmental risks, resource constraints, and resilience objectives into sustainable urban recovery planning.

References

[1]AHERN J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 100(4): 341-343.

[2]MEEROW S, NEWELL J P, STULTS M. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 147: 38-49.

[3]BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752.

[4]OUYANG M, DUEÑAS-OSORIO L, MIN X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Structural Safety, 2012, 36-37: 23-31.

[5]CUTTER S L, BURTON C G, EMRICH C T. Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2010, 7(1).

[6]CUTTER S L. Compound, cascading, or complex disasters: What's in a name? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2018, 60(6): 16-25.

[7]MEEROW S, NEWELL J P. Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? Urban Geography, 2019, 40(3): 309-329.

[8]ZHANG X, SONG J, PENG J, et al. Landslides-oriented urban disaster resilience assessment: A case study in Shenzhen, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 661: 95-106.

[9]BATTY M. Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2018, 45(5): 817-820.

[10]FULLER A, FAN Z, DAY C, et al. Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 108952-108971.

[11]MINERVA R, LEE G M, CRESPI N. Digital twin in the IoT context: A survey on technical features, scenarios, and architectural models. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2020, 108(10): 1785-1824.

[12]RASHEED A, SAN O, KVAMSDAL T. Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 21980-22012.

[13]JONES D, SNIDER C, NASSEHI A, et al. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2020, 29: 36-52.

[14]KRITZINGER W, KARNER M, TRAAR G, et al. Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(11): 1016-1022.

[15]QI Q, TAO F. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 3585-3593.

[16]TAO F, ZHANG M, LIU Y, et al. Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment. CIRP Annals, 2018, 67(1): 169-172.

[17]NEGRI E, FUMAGALLI L, MACCHI M. A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, 11: 939-948.

[18]CARAGLIU A, DEL BO C, NIJKAMP P. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 2011, 18(2): 65-82.

[19]BATTY M. Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2013, 3(3): 274-279.

[20]KITCHIN R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 2014, 79: 1-14.

[21]HOLLANDS R G. Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 2008, 12(3): 303-320.

[22]KANG H, CHEN J, LIANG S, et al. An AI-driven intelligent health assessment system for high-voltage switchgear based on multimodal sensor data fusion. Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2026, 2(1).

[23]LIU Z. Explainable machine learning for telecom customer churn prediction and actionable retention strategies. Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2026, 2(1).

[24]GAO Z. Data-driven predictive maintenance of permanent magnet synchronous motor systems using explainable machine learning and digital twin architecture. Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2026, 2(2).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

How to Cite

A Closed-Loop Digital Twin Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Post-Disaster Urban Recovery: Integrating Environmental Assessment, Risk Prediction, and Adaptive Resource Management. (2026). Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2(3), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.65455/2e987122