From Biomechanical Markers to Risk Prediction: Machine Learning Advances in Early Warning of Recurrent Acute Ankle Sprain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65455/fsr64454

Keywords:

Ankle Sprain, Chronic Ankle Instability, Biomechanical Markers, Machine Learning, Injury Risk Prediction, Wearable Sensors, Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Acute lateral ankle sprain is among the most frequent injuries in sports medicine, and its high recurrence rate and propensity toward chronic ankle instability (CAI) constitute a persistent clinical challenge. Conventional risk assessment—relying on subjective questionnaires, physical examination, and clinical experience—captures only part of the complex biomechanical and neuromuscular adaptations that follow an initial sprain. Recent advances in objective biomechanical profiling and machine learning (ML) have opened a new paradigm for individualized recurrence prediction. This review synthesizes the full translational chain from biomechanical marker identification to ML-based risk prediction. We first summarize key markers spanning gait kinetics (ground reaction forces and joint moments), proprioceptive and neuromuscular control deficits, and dynamic postural stability, highlighting the representational advantages of multimodal data fusion. We then compare mainstream ML architectures—including tree-based ensembles, recurrent networks for gait time series, and strategies for small-sample learning—and discuss the role of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in linking predictions to injury mechanisms. Evidence indicates that models integrating multimodal biomechanical features outperform conventional clinical scores (e.g., Ankle-GO, AUC 0.70), with few-shot learning systems achieving test accuracies of 0.89 and inertial-sensor-driven recurrent networks estimating ankle kinematics with coefficients of determination up to 0.93. Finally, we evaluate validation strategies, clinical utility in rehabilitation prescription and return-to-sport decisions, and wearable-based long-term monitoring, and we dissect the outstanding challenges of data standardization, model interpretability, annotation scarcity, and ethical governance. Emerging technologies—digital twins, federated learning, and generative AI for data augmentation—offer plausible routes toward a precise, interpretable, and equitable intelligent prevention ecosystem for recurrent ankle sprain.

References

[1]HOLLANDER J J, KERKHOFFS G M M J. Editorial Commentary: Revision Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction Improves Symptoms, but Outcomes Reflect the Revision Context. Arthroscopy, 2026, 42(6): 1050-1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70376

[2]LUAN L, ADAMS R, PAPPAS E, et al. Unraveling Chronic Ankle Instability: A Data-Driven Clustering Approach to Redefine Subtypes and Improve Diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2026, 34: 894-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2026.3653182

[3]CORLÙY H, SCHAMPHELEER E, MARICOT A, et al. Neurocognitive Deficits Related to Ligamentous Ankle Injuries: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine Open, 2026, 12(1): 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00951-5

[4]MAILUHU A K, VERHAGEN E A, VAN OCHTEN J, et al. E-health intervention for preventing recurrent ankle sprains: a randomised controlled trial in general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 2024, 74(738): e56-e62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0465

[5]PICOT B, FOURCHET F, RAULINE G, et al. Ankle-GO score is associated with the probability of becoming coper after lateral ankle sprain: a 1-year prospective cohort study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2024, 58(19): 1115-1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108361

[6]ZHAO Y, PANG L, GE Y, et al. Contralateral Balance Training Improves Postural Control and Functional Recovery After Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Trial. Sports Medicine Open, 2026, 12(1): 104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-026-01078-x

[7]LECKEY C, VAN DYK N, DOHERTY C, et al. Machine learning approaches to injury risk prediction in sport: a scoping review with evidence synthesis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2025, 59(7): 491-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108576

[8]LINDSKOG J, HEDER TERNELL K, YU Y, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in sports medicine: mapping clinical tasks and assessing clinical maturity - a scoping review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2026, 26(1): 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03615-w

[9]ELABD O M, ELABD A M, EL-AZEZ M S A, et al. Impact of chronic ankle instability on gait loading strategy in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a comparative study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2024, 21(1): 185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01478-8

[10]ZHANG Z, WEI S, SHI H, et al. Association between lower extremity movement patterns and ACL loading in CAI patients across varied ankle sprain frequencies within a year. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2025, 22(1): 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01552-9

[11]CROTTY E D, FURLONG L A M, HARRISON A J. Ankle and Plantar Flexor Muscle–Tendon Unit Function in Sprinters: A Narrative Review. Sports Medicine, 2024, 54(3): 585-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01967-1

[12]KIM K M, KIM J S, NEEDLE A R. Soleus arthrogenic muscle inhibition following acute lateral ankle sprain correlates with symptoms and ankle disability but not with postural control. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2024, 13(4): 559-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2024.02.005

[13]WANG J, CHEN J, ZHAO Y, et al. Anatomy changes, signalling pathways, and clinical treatment after ankle sprain. Bone & Joint Research, 2026, 15(4): 425-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.154.BJR-2025-0168.R1

[14]YU P, YU Y, SUN J, et al. Effect of visual disruption on the lower limb kinematic and kinetic characteristics in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2026, 14: 1767092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1767092

[15]CHOU T Y, HUANG Y L, LEUNG W, et al. Does prior concussion lead to biomechanical alterations associated with lateral ankle sprain and anterior cruciate ligament injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2023, 57(23): 1509-1515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-106980

[16]ZHU X, WEI F, LI S, et al. Toe-out landing reduces anterior talofibular ligament strain while maintains calcaneofibular ligament strain in people with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2025, 14: 101035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101035

[17]LIU H, XIE Z, GUO R, et al. Development and Validation of a Wearable Intelligent Telerehabilitation Device for Postoperative Rehabilitation of Chronic Ankle Instability Using a Portable Integrated Sensors System and Few-Shot Learning Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2026, 34: 416-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3643393

[18]HUTH M, CANAL-SIMÓN B, FERRER E, et al. Injury prediction in elite women's football: an integrative machine learning-based decision-support framework. npj Digital Medicine, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02937-3

[19]KHANI M, FRIEDLAND D R, WIDLANSKY M, et al. Explainable AI reveals temporal risk pathways in fall prediction: Extracting clinical insights from multi-horizon machine learning models. GeroScience, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-026-02117-x

[20]XIANG L, GU Y, GAO Z, et al. Integrating an LSTM framework for predicting ankle joint biomechanics during gait using inertial sensors. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 170: 108016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108016

[21]WANG L, SONG P, STONE T, et al. Ankle Kinematics Estimation Using Artificial Neural Network and Multimodal IMU Data. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2025, 29(4): 2617-2628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2024.3514669

[22]LIU X, ZHANG Y, JIAO Y, et al. DAGAN-Based Gait Features Augmentation for Ankle Instability Detection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2025, 33: 2793-2805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3587233

[23]LIANG H W, AMERI R, BAND S, et al. Fall risk classification with posturographic parameters in community-dwelling older adults: a machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence approach. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2024, 21(1): 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01310-3

[24]YIN R, CHEN H, WANG C, et al. Transformer-Based Multilabel Deep Learning Model Is Efficient for Detecting Ankle Lateral and Medial Ligament Injuries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Improving Clinicians' Diagnostic Accuracy for Rotational Chronic Ankle Instability. Arthroscopy, 2025, 41(3): 574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.027

[25]GU H, YEN S C, FOLMAR E, et al. GaitNet+ARL: A Deep Learning Algorithm for Interpretable Gait Analysis of Chronic Ankle Instability. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2024, 28(7): 3918-3927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2024.3383588

[26]KANG H, LI X, FENG M, et al. Applying radiomics and deep learning to investigations into seafarers' health status. Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2025, 1(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.65455/nqcbkw66

[27]HOSSAIN M S B, NGUYEN S, DRANETZ J, et al. A Wearable Motion Capture Dataset for Gait Analysis Using IMUs and Shank-Mounted Egocentric Cameras. Scientific Data, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07657-7

[28]YANG F, HUANG J, WEI Q, et al. The Impact of Football Boot Design on Lower Limb Injury Risk: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine Open, 2026, 12(1): 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-026-01037-6

[29]AN Y, LI Y, WANG H, et al. Human-Machine Co-Adaptation for Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation via Dual-Agent Multiple Model Reinforcement Learning (DAMMRL). IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2026: 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2026.3685832

[30]MANOHARAN G, LEE H. User-Adaptive Variable Impedance Control Using Bayesian Optimization for Robot-Aided Ankle Rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2025, 33: 3355-3366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3602899

[31]ZENG Z, XU Z, SHEN B, et al. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic ankle instability? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2026, 23(1): 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-01916-9

[32]ROSINSKY P, MATZKIN E, ROSSI M J. Standardizing Definitions for Reporting Return to Sport and Athlete Levels in Sports Medicine Outcomes Research. Arthroscopy, 2026, 42(4): 691-694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70174

[33]TABERNER M, SPENCER N, MURPHY B, et al. Progressing On-Court Rehabilitation After Injury: The Control-Chaos Continuum Adapted to Basketball. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2023, 53(9): 498-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11981

[34]TABERNER M, ALLEN T, O'KEEFE J, et al. Evolving the Control-Chaos Continuum: Part 2—Shifting "Attention" to Progress On-Pitch Rehabilitation. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2025, 55(3): 162-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13159

[35]AKTER A, RANI G M, APU M M H, et al. Toward intelligent wearables: engineering self-powered triboelectric nanofiber sensors for the classification of risky ankle postures. Materials Horizons, 2026, 13(15): 7674-7689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5MH02434J

[36]ZHANG Y, ZHENG X T, ZHANG X, et al. Hybrid Integration of Wearable Devices for Physiological Monitoring. Chemical Reviews, 2024, 124(18): 10386-10434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00471

[37]XU M, LANG S, WANG J, et al. Emergency Clinical Decision for Sports Injury Management: A Wearable Sensor-Driven Framework from Training to Rehabilitation. Biosensors, 2026, 16(4): 205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16040205

[38]XU Z. Continuous blood pressure estimation and cardiovascular risk assessment based on wearable PPG signals. Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2026, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.65455/6pgttp36

[39]GENG X, JIN Y, WANG X, et al. Digital Physiotherapeutic Ankle-Specific Training System for Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability Following Modified Brostrom Surgery: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial at a Tertiary Grade A Trauma Center in China. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025, 13: e78307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/78307

[40]HAN F, HUANG X, WANG X, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. MedComm, 2025, 6(7): e70260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70260

[41]NANEVSKI I, JÄGER S, SCHULTE-ALTHOFF M, et al. The Potential of AI in Nursing Care: Multicenter Evaluation in Fall Risk Assessment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2025, 27: e71034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/71034

[42]XIANG L, GU Y, DENG K, et al. Integrating personalized shape prediction, biomechanical modeling, and wearables for bone stress prediction in runners. npj Digital Medicine, 2025, 8(1): 276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01677-0

[43]NATARAJ C, HEMMATI S. Harnessing Nonlinear Mechanics to Transform Medical Diagnostics. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2025, 77(6): 061001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070319

[44]JAYAKUMAR P, RATHOUZ P J, LIN E, et al. Shared decision making using digital twins in knee osteoarthritis care: a randomized clinical trial of an AI-enabled decision aid versus education alone on decision quality, physical function, and user experience. eClinicalMedicine, 2025, 89: 103545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103545

[45]LIN X, CHEN Y, WU J, et al. Federated generative prompt learning with vision foundation models: universal efficient multi-center medical image analysis. npj Digital Medicine, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02866-1

[46]QU Z, LI Y, LIU B, et al. DTQFL: A Digital Twin-Assisted Quantum Federated Learning Algorithm for Intelligent Diagnosis in 5G Mobile Network. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2026, 30(1): 17-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2023.3303401

[47]RATNER A, BACH S H, EHRENBERG H, et al. Snorkel: rapid training data creation with weak supervision. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2017, 11(3): 269-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14778/3157794.3157797

[48]ZHOU Z H. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. National Science Review, 2018, 5(1): 44-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx106

[49]HARESAMUDRAM H, ESSA I, PLÖTZ T. Contrastive predictive coding for human activity recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2021, 5(2): 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3463506

[50]MAKAROV N, BORDUKOVA M, QUENGDAENG P, et al. Large language models forecast patient health trajectories enabling digital twins. npj Digital Medicine, 2025, 8(1): 588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02004-3

[51]LUO Y, KHAN M O, WEN C, et al. FairDiffusion: Enhancing equity in latent diffusion models via fair Bayesian perturbation. Science Advances, 2025, 11(14): eads4593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ads4593

[52]TEMPLIN T, PEREZ M W, SYLVIA S, et al. Addressing 6 challenges in generative AI for digital health: A scoping review. PLOS Digital Health, 2024, 3(5): e0000503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000503

[53]PANAYIDES A S, CHEN H, FILIPOVIC N D, et al. Position Paper: Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis: Advances, Clinical Translation, and Emerging Frontiers. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2026, 30(2): 1187-1202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3649496

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

How to Cite

From Biomechanical Markers to Risk Prediction: Machine Learning Advances in Early Warning of Recurrent Acute Ankle Sprain. (2026). Applied Artificial Intelligence Research, 2(3), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.65455/fsr64454